IDR outcomes

What three years of federal disputes say

Every quarter CMS publishes every federal payment dispute an arbiter decided. We read all of them, because this is the record our work is judged against. Here is what it says, in the order a practice asks.

8,225,470 line items in 3,393,003 decided disputes, 2023 Q1 to 2025 Q4 · national public data, not Spectare's results · data version 2025Q4-166d8d

01Who wins

Providers win most of the disputes they take to an arbiter.

86%
of contested disputes won by the provider1,753,288 contested disputes, the latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4)
2,180,938
disputes decided in those four quarters5,722,653 line items
75% to 89%
the range of the win rate across all twelve quarters2023 Q1 to 2025 Q4

A dispute is contested when both sides made an offer and paid their fee. Default decisions, where one side did neither, were 20% of disputes; they are left out of the win rate and counted separately. The arbiter cannot split the difference, so a win means the arbiter took the provider's number.

Line items decided per quarter, and the share providers won

Bars: line items with a payment determination in the quarter. Line: the share of contested disputes decided for the provider or facility. The 2025 volumes include the backlog the arbiters cleared that year, so a quarter's decisions are not a quarter's new disputes.

'23 Q1: 65,231 line items, 75% won by providers'23 Q2: 113,043 line items, 85% won by providers'23 Q3: 76,525 line items, 81% won by providers'23 Q4: 78,425 line items, 89% won by providers'24 Q1: 186,469 line items, 88% won by providers'24 Q2: 377,629 line items, 84% won by providers'24 Q3: 660,595 line items, 85% won by providers'24 Q4: 944,900 line items, 85% won by providers'25 Q1: 1,112,854 line items, 86% won by providers'25 Q2: 1,629,014 line items, 87% won by providers'25 Q3: 1,573,101 line items, 85% won by providers'25 Q4: 1,407,684 line items, 83% won by providers'23 Q1: 75% won by providers'23 Q2: 85% won by providers'23 Q3: 81% won by providers'23 Q4: 89% won by providers'24 Q1: 88% won by providers'24 Q2: 84% won by providers'24 Q3: 85% won by providers'24 Q4: 85% won by providers'25 Q1: 86% won by providers'25 Q2: 87% won by providers'25 Q3: 85% won by providers'25 Q4: 83% won by providers'23 Q1'23 Q3'24 Q1'24 Q3'25 Q1'25 Q3'25 Q4

02How much

The award is usually several times the payer's own rate.

4.0×
the payer's rate: the median awardmiddle half 2.2× to 8.1×
$611
the median award in dollarsagainst a median payer's rate of $159

The payer's rate is its qualifying payment amount: its own median in-network rate, by its own math. Payers' final offers ran a median 1.00× that rate and providers asked 4.7×; the arbiter took the provider's number 86% of the time. See it code by code.

From what the payer paid first to what the arbiter awarded

Medians in dollars across every decided line item, the latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4), national. First payments are in the files from 2025 Q3.

Payer paid first$95
Payer's rate (QPA)$159
Payer's final offer$180
Provider's final offer$674
The award$611

The anonymised dollar file; rates under $1 excluded. The award is the offer the arbiter chose.

03Which services

Emergency medicine is most of it. The specialties that never chose the patient are most of the rest.

33%
of line items were emergency visitsthe latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4)
44%
were radiology, pathology, anesthesia or neuromonitoring

Grouped by CMS's own code ranges. The bar shows how contested line items were decided, provider against payer; the count is every line item in the group. The win rate holds across groups; the multiples of the payer's rate differ a great deal. Every group, by quarter and state.

Decided for the provider, by service group

the latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4), national.

04Where

Texas files 44% of it. The win rate holds everywhere.

44%
of line items were for care given in Texasthe latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4)
79% to 91%
the provider win rate across the fifteen busiest states

The state is where the service was given, as CMS records it. Texas is where the federal process does most of its work; the record is deep enough in most states to read on its own. The record where you practice.

05What gets thrown out

One filed dispute in five is thrown out before an arbiter sees it.

20%
of disputes closed in 2025 Q4 were found ineligible135,866 of 692,048
42%
of disputes had their eligibility challenged by the payer

A dispute found ineligible costs the filer its fees and its time, and never reaches an arbiter. Screening before filing is most of the work, and it is most of ours: the claims that do not qualify stay on your list with the reason, and some go to an ordinary appeal instead.

How the 692,048 disputes closed in 2025 Q4 ended

Decided by an arbiter542,138
Found ineligible135,866
Withdrawn, settled or closed for another reason14,044
Filed in the quarter719,118
Administrative fees collected by HHS$143.1M
Paid to arbiters$304.8M

CMS Federal IDR Supplemental Tables, 2025 Q4, tables 1, 4, 5 and 6. Closures in a quarter include disputes filed earlier.

06How long

A decision takes about 31 business days. The money is due 30 calendar days after it.

31
business days from filing to decision, median50% of decisions came within 30
$545
the arbiter's fee the losing side paid, median31% of disputes were batched

Medians over the latest four quarters (2025 Q1 to 2025 Q4), national. The rules then give the payer 30 calendar days to pay the award; the files record decisions, not payments, so collection is a separate job. Batching spreads the fees over several lines, and from November 2026 a batch may carry up to 50. Whether one line is worth filing.

What the files cannot say

  • Whether an award was paid. The files record decisions, not collections.
  • Why a particular dispute was ineligible, or anything about disputes that never reached a decision, beyond the counts.
  • What in-network contracts pay. The payer's rate is the payer's own median, as the filer reported it; some are nominal or unit prices, which makes a few multiples absurd. Medians and percentiles, never averages, are used throughout.
  • Anything about a patient. Nothing here is a prediction of any claim's outcome, and nothing is Spectare's own result.

How we count: every source, rule and check, and the limits of the files.

The full tables and charts are easiest to read on a larger screen. On a phone, start with the figures above, or ask for a free claims review and we will read your own remittances for you.

Have claims you'd like reviewed?

The outcomes say what has happened to other practices' claims. A free claims review says what is in yours: which lines qualify, the deadlines still open, and what we expect to recover. No patient information is needed for the first conversation.

Request a claims review

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Federal IDR Public Use File [Data file and data dictionary]. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/nosurprises/policies-and-resources/reports. Spectare Health's reading; figures are national public data about federal disputes, not Spectare's results, and not a guarantee of any outcome. Data version 2025Q4-166d8d, prepared 2026-10-14.

Request a free claims review

Find out what your remittances are worth.

A free review of your last 90 days of remittances. Within 24 hours you get a written list of every eligible claim, the deadlines still open, and the recovery we expect.

Which payers underpay you most, or anything else that would help. Please leave out patient details.

We reply within 24 hours. See how we handle what you send in our privacy policy.

Request received.

Thank you. We’ll get back to you within 24 hours.